William Cassara, Attorney at Military Law

Home | Courts-martial | Appeals | Records Correction & Discharge upgrades | Claims against the Military | Investigations & Article 15s | Administrative Boards | Disclaimer


What are the differences between courts-martial and civilian trials?

Contact William Cassara

You may contact Mr. Cassara at bill@williamcassara.com or call him at
(888) 288-3347
 FREE CONSULTATION

Caution: Use of e-mail does not constitute an attorney-client relationship and is not a secure method of transferring personal information.  Please use it to request general information.

The differences are numerous. As noted, the military requires an Article 32 investigation, in which the accused is present, and his or her counsel may ask questions of the witnesses. In addition, at a court-martial, the verdict does not have to be unanimous (except in order to impose the death penalty) and the “convening authority” (usually the base commander) selects the panel members. There is no random jury selection.

At a court-martial, the accused is represented free of charge by a military attorney. In addition, the accused can elect to retain civilian counsel at no expense to the government. If you are considering hiring a civilian attorney, we recommend hiring one with experience in military law and courts-martial.

There are other significant differences between courts-martial and civilian trials. Contact Mr. Cassara by phone or e-mail in order to discuss your case with him in confidence.


 

Copyright © 1999-2007 William E. Cassara, P.C. (All Rights Reserved)
Site developed by CDImage, L.L.C.