|

What are the differences
between courts-martial and civilian trials?

The differences are numerous. As
noted, the military requires an Article 32 investigation, in which the
accused is present, and his or her counsel may ask questions of the
witnesses. In addition, at a court-martial, the verdict does not have to be
unanimous (except in order to impose the death penalty) and the “convening
authority” (usually the base commander) selects the panel members. There is
no random jury selection.
At a court-martial, the accused is represented free of charge by a
military attorney. In addition, the accused can elect to retain
civilian counsel at no expense to the government. If you are
considering hiring a civilian attorney, we recommend hiring one with
experience in military law and courts-martial.
There are other significant differences
between courts-martial and civilian trials. Contact Mr. Cassara by
phone or e-mail in order to discuss your case with him in confidence.
|